PICO Sparse focal plane simulation of noise

• TOAST: `119db6ae8204230aafbaf0cb1d46d84f8d36cbf3`
• `pico-simulations`: Tag `201806_sparse_focal_plane_noise`

• All 21 bands
• pixels/wafer reduced to 7 for all bands
• sampling frequency reduced all to 63 Hz, unless it was already lower
• hitmaps and noise covariance matrices corrected to be representative of the full focal plane and nominal sampling frequency
• baseline 1/f and white noise
• 1 year
• output units of all products are `microKelvin_CMB`
• see the SLURM scripts and other configuration files

Available maps:

• IQU maps binned and destriped with Madam
• White noise covariance matrices `wcov.fits`, white noise levels were reduced in order to be representative of the total focalplane
• Original hitmaps from Madam (less detectors, lower sampling rate) and corrected hitmaps representative of nominal focal plane

NERSC

`/global/project/projectdirs/pico/noise/sparse_focalplane_1year`

Consistency check of hitmaps, noise covariance matrices, NET and TT spectra of the noise maps:

• All bands (slow to load)
• Just band 10

Comparison of a 30 days simulation of the sparse and the full focalplane for band 9:

(.png)

There is a difference in the dipoles, but the level is tiny. I checked the dipole in map domain, the sparse map has 14e-3 muK, while the full focalplane map as 7e-3 muK. I checked also the 1 year simulation and that has 6e-3 muK.