| FILE TYPE LINK LEGEND: | HTML | PPTX & PPT | XLSX | DOCX & DOC | JPG, PNG, GIF |
→ PICO Wiki ARCHIVED SITE - HOME
Agenda
- Discuss which systematics to simulate and parametrization
- How to assess validity of 1/f noise values?
Minutes
- Actions: Andrea implementing c) i) for PICO. After that we can decide if need gain variation.
- Brendan: Ask thermal engineer at JPL to get estimates on thermal variations in the intrument? Is there also possibility of estimating polarized emission and IP from the optics?
Action Item [Joy]: how are the maps with systematics going to be evaluated?- Shaul first wants effect to be evaluated on only CMB + noise, no lensing or foregrounds.
- Josquin could take in maps with systematics and run them through pipeline including foreground separation and estimate sigma_r
- Action Item [Graca]: email Lloyd to ask about data challenge pipeline
- Action Item [Brendan]: What is the scope of Brad’s work with GRASP?
Action Item [Joy]: Talk to Shaul and get readout / detector noise estimates for PICO- Shaul agrees readout noise shouldn't dominate
- Brendan's email exchange with Roger seems enough to use 10 mHz estimate for f_knee
Action Item [Brendan]: Get estimate on polarization angle calibration from Planck
Last modified: 2017/12/05 19:17 by joydidier